关键点 español English 问题
2型糖尿病患者低血清胆固醇水平与由磁共振神经成像评估的外周神经损伤程度之间是否存在关联?
结果
这项针对100名2型糖尿病成人的横断面队列研究发现,神经病变的数量与血清总胆固醇水平呈负相关。
意义
调查结果表明,降低2型糖尿病患者的血清胆固醇水平与糖尿病多发性神经病变有关
Importance
Lowering serum cholesterol levels is a well-established treatment for dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, nerve lesions in patients with T2D increase with lower serum cholesterol levels, suggesting that lowering serum cholesterol levels is associated with diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) in patients with T2D.
Objective
To investigate whether there is an association between serum cholesterol levels and peripheral nerve lesions in patients with T2D with and without DPN.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This single-center, cross-sectional, prospective cohort study was performed from June 1, 2015, to March 31, 2018. Observers were blinded to clinical data. A total of 256 participants were approached, of whom 156 were excluded. A total of 100 participants consented to undergo magnetic resonance neurography of the right leg at the Department of Neuroradiology and clinical, serologic, and electrophysiologic assessment at the Department of Endocrinology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Exposures
Quantification of the nerve’s diameter and lipid equivalent lesion (LEL) load with a subsequent analysis of all acquired clinical and serologic data with use of 3.0-T magnetic resonance neurography of the right leg with 3-dimensional reconstruction of the sciatic nerve.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The primary outcome was lesion load and extension. Secondary outcomes were clinical, serologic, and electrophysiologic findings.
Results
A total of 100 participants with T2D (mean [SD] age, 64.6 [0.9] years; 68 [68.0%] male) participated in the study. The LEL load correlated positively with the nerve’s mean cross-sectional area (r = 0.44; P < .001) and the maximum length of a lesion (r = 0.71; P < .001). The LEL load was negatively associated with total serum cholesterol level (r = −0.41; P < .001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (r = −0.30; P = .006), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (r = −0.33; P = .003), nerve conduction velocities of the tibial (r = −0.33; P = .01) and peroneal (r = −0.51; P < .001) nerves, and nerve conduction amplitudes of the tibial (r = −0.31; P = .02) and peroneal (r = −0.28; P = .03) nerves.
Conclusions and Relevance
The findings suggest that lowering serum cholesterol levels in patients with T2D and DPN is associated with a higher amount of nerve lesions and declining nerve conduction velocities and amplitudes. These findings may be relevant to emerging therapies that promote an aggressive lowering of serum cholesterol levels in patients with T2D.
Distal symmetric diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is one of the most severe complications of diabetes, affecting approximately 200 million patients worldwide, with increasing prevalence leading to high morbidity and rising health care costs.1 Although the exact metabolic processes underlying DPN are still uncertain, several clinical and serologic risk factors for developing DPN, such as obesity, hypertension, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and a decrease in renal function, have been identified in clinical studies.2-4 The poor outcomes after adjusting serum glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared with type 1 diabetes (T1D) suggest that risk factors other than hyperglycemia might play an important role in the development of DPN.3,5 An in vitro study6 found that, in samples from patients with T2D and DPN, lipid composition of Schwann cells is altered compared with samples from control individuals without DPN. To date, it has not been possible to visualize those alterations in the nerve’s microstructure in vivo. Inpatient magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) at 3.0 T is a noninvasive method that allows for an exact qualitative and quantitative analysis of nerve damage in different neuropathies.7-9 Recent results from an MRN study10 in patients with DPN have shown that a decrease in serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels is associated with an increase in fat-equivalent lesions of the sciatic nerve and an increase in clinical symptom severity. These nerve lesions also occurred more frequently in patients with T2D compared with patients with T1D.10 The exact role of cholesterol metabolism in the development of DPN, however, is unknown, and it has not yet been determined whether lowering serum cholesterol levels in patients with T2D has a positive influence on the course of T2D DPN.11 Some clinical studies11,12 have found that a lowering of serum cholesterol levels had positive effects on the course of DPN that were mainly attributed to lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and to anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects of statin treatment. However, low serum cholesterol levels are associated with neuropathic symptoms and impair nerve regeneration after axonal damage in neurons of the central and peripheral nervous systems.13-17 This association was mainly attributed to an insufficient supply of cholesterol to neurite tips and adjacent Schwann cells of regenerating axons as a consequence of a decrease in lipoproteins.14,18-21 With regard to emerging therapies, such as protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors that promote an aggressive lowering of total serum cholesterol levels,16 it is crucial to understand whether a decrease in total serum cholesterol and LDL-C levels is beneficial or potentially harmful for patients with T2D with DPN.
The aim of this study was to investigate the association of cholesterol metabolism in combination with other potential clinical and serologic risk factors with the development of macrostructural and microstructural alterations of the sciatic nerve in T2D. To acquire factors such as the mean cross-sectional area (MCA) of the sciatic nerve and to achieve a precise calculation of volume and extent of nerve lesions in relation to vital nerve tissue, this study used high-resolution MRN at 3.0 T in combination with advanced image analysis tools.
Study Design and Participants
Participants were screened and recruited at the outpatient clinic of the Department of Endocrinology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany, where all clinical, serologic, and electrophysiologic examinations were performed. Thereafter, patients underwent MRN at the Department of Neuroradiology, where image processing was performed. All patient data were pseudonymized, and participating researchers at the Department of Neuroradiology were blinded to all patient data. In total, 256 patients were screened, and 156 were excluded. A total of 100 patients with T2D took part in this prospective study from June 1, 2015, to March 31, 2018. Overall exclusion criteria were age younger than 18 years; pregnancy; any contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging; any history of lumbar surgery; relevant disc protrusion or herniation; any other risk factors for neuropathy, such as alcoholism, malignant or infectious diseases, hypovitaminosis, or monoclonal gammopathy; any previous or ongoing exposure to neurotoxic agents; and any chronic neurologic diseases, such as Parkinson disease, restless leg syndrome, or multiple sclerosis. To exclude severe renal insufficiency or macroangiopathy as potential confounders, only patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than 60 mL/min, an ankle-brachial index (ABI) greater than 0.9, and an intima-media thickness (IMT) less than 0.9 mm were included in the study. This study was approved by the Heidelberg Study on Diabetes and Complications Ethics Committee, and all participants gave written informed consent. The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.
Clinical and Electrophysiologic Examination
For every patient, a detailed medical history was documented and an examination of neuropathic symptoms was performed according to the guidelines issued by the German Society for Diabetology, including evaluation of the neuropathy deficit score (NDS) and the neuropathy symptom score (NSS).22
DPN was determined according to the following criteria: a score of 5 or higher in the NDS or NSS (if a discrepancy between the NDS and NSS was found, the higher score was chosen23) and abnormal nerve conduction test results in at least 2 different nerves.
The electrophysiologic examination (Viasys Healthcare VikingQuest; Viasys Healthcare GmbH) of the right leg included the following: distal motor latencies of the right tibial and peroneal nerves; motor (compound muscle action potentials [CMAPs]) and sensory amplitudes (sensory nerve action potential) of the tibial, peroneal, and sural nerves; and nerve conduction velocities (NCVs) of the tibial, peroneal, and sural nerves. The skin temperature was at least 32 °C throughout the examination. The 24-hour blood pressure was documented (TM-2430 with CA11 blood pressure cuff, size adapted to the patient’s upper arm circumference; Boso d.o.o.), and IMT was detected with duplex ultrasonographic examination of both carotid arteries (SonoAce X8; Samsung Group). The ABI was calculated using noninvasive blood pressure measurements of the arms and ankles (ABI System 1000; Boso d.o.o.).
Blood samples were obtained while patients were in a fasting state and processed immediately under standardized conditions in the central laboratory of Heidelberg University Hospital. Albumin excretion in urine was detected in morning spot urine within all participants. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula.24
All participants underwent high-resolution MRN of the right leg in a 3.0-T magnetic resonance scanner (Magnetom TIM-TRIO; Siemens Healthcare). A 15-channel transmit-receive extremity coil was used, and we applied an axial, high-resolution, T2-weighted, turbo spin-echo, 2-dimensional sequence with spectral fat saturation (T2wFS) of the right middle thigh at the following settings: relaxation time, 5970 milliseconds; echo time, 55 milliseconds; field of view, 160 × 160 mm2; matrix size, 512 × 512; section thickness, 4 mm; intersection gap, 0.35 mm; voxel size, 0.5 × 0.3 × 4.0 mm3; and number of sections, 24. No artificial image filters were used to avoid artificial alteration of the acquired T2wFS signal (Figure 1A gives a typical acquired image at the thigh level). In each participant, the sequence was centered to the sciatic nerve bifurcation to ascertain that the anatomical region mapped by MRN was comparable in all participants.
All images generated were pseudonymized. Images at the middle thigh level were analyzed in a semiautomatic approach using ImageJ and custom-written code in Matlab, version 7.14.0.0739 (R2012a).25,26 A total number of 2400 images were analyzed accordingly. Anatomical segmentation of the sciatic nerve’s tibial compartment and the proximal tibial nerve was performed for all participants. The peroneal compartment was excluded from nerve segmentation because its curving course at the distal thigh level below the sciatic nerve’s bifurcation poses a potential risk for magic angle artifacts and does not allow for precise volumetric analysis based on axial T2wFS images.27,28 Lesions were segmented by comparing muscle and nerve signals on every individual section. The detailed process of anatomical nerve segmentation and lesion mapping has been described elsewhere.10 Binarized maps of lesions and vital nerve tissue were analyzed in Matlab26 (Figure 1B-D gives a 3-dimensional reconstruction of T2wFS-hypointense tibial nerve lesions in 3 patients with T2D at different clinical stages of DPN). Specifically, we determined the lesion ratio as the number of lesion voxels divided by the number of voxels in vital nerve tissue. We further obtained the MCA and the maximal craniocaudal length of a lesion of each nerve using lesion-specific, 3-dimensional, connected-component labeling with a voxel connectivity of 26.28
Statistical data analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc). All data were tested for gaussian normal distribution using the D’Agostino-Pearson omnibus normality test. If a gaussian normal distribution was given, t tests were used for comparisons of 2 groups, 1-way analyses of variance were applied for comparisons of more than 2 groups, and Bonferroni-corrected Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for correlation analysis. If data were not gaussian distributed, the Mann-Whitney test was used for comparisons of 2 groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for multiple comparisons of more than 3 groups, and Dunn-corrected nonparametric Spearman correlations were applied for correlation analysis. For all tests, the level of significance was defined at a 2-tailed P < .05. All results are presented as mean (SE).
Clinical and Epidemiologic Data
A total of 100 patients with T2D with DPN (n = 64) or without DPN (n = 36) were included in this study (mean [SD] age, 64.6 [0.9] years; 68 [68.0%] male). Total serum cholesterol level was positively correlated with tibial NCV (r = 0.32; P = .02), peroneal NCV (r = 0.30; P = .03), and tibial nerve CMAP (r = 0.35; P = .01). Serum LDL-C level was also positively correlated with tibial NCV (r = 0.28; P = .04), peroneal NCV (r = 0.30; P = .02), and tibial CMAP (r = 0.44; P = .001). No such correlation was found for serum HDL-C level. Furthermore, no correlations were found for patient’s age, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, or renal function outcomes with electrophysiologic findings or clinical scores. Clinical, electrophysiologic, and serologic data of patients with and without DPN are presented in Table 1.
Lipid Equivalent Lesion Load
We found an increase of T2wFS-hypointense lipid equivalent lesion (LEL) load to be negatively associated with the NCVs of the tibial (r = −0.33; P = .01) and peroneal nerves (r = −0.51; P < .001) (eFigure, A and B in the Supplement) and with the CMAPs of the tibial (r = − 0.31; P = .02) and peroneal nerves (r = −0.28; P = .03). Further negative correlations were determined between LEL load and total serum cholesterol level (r = −0.41; P < .001) (Figure 2A), HDL-C level (r = −0.30; P = .006), and LDL-C level (r = −0.33; P = .003). Positive correlations were found between LEL load and the NDS (r = 0.31; P = .005), NSS (r = 0.23; P = .03), MCA of the tibial nerve (r = 0.44; P < .001), and mean maximum length of a lesion (r = 0.71; P < .001). No significant correlations were found for LEL load and other serologic risk factors, such as HbA1c level, eGFR, creatinine level, or triglyceride levels. Additional partial regression analysis for LEL load and cholesterol levels, controlled for age, disease duration, BMI, eGFR, and creatinine, HbA1c, and triglyceride levels, revealed that LEL load was independently correlated with total serum cholesterol (r = −0.42; P = .001) and LDL-C (r = −0.49; P < .001) levels.
The mean maximum length of a lesion was positively correlated with the MCA and LEL load. Negative correlations were found for lesion length with NCVs of the tibial (r = −0.40; P = .002) and peroneal nerves (r = −0.47; P < .001) (eFigure, C and D in the Supplement) and CMAPs of the tibial (r = −0.26; P = .049) and peroneal nerves (r = −0.26; P = .047). Furthermore, we found negative correlations of the lesion length with total serum cholesterol level (r = −0.44; P < .001) (Figure 2B) and serum LDL-C levels (r = −0.38; P = .001). Correlations of MRN parameters with clinical, epidemiologic, and serologic factors are given in Table 2 and Table 3. Additional partial regression analysis for the maximum length of a lesion and cholesterol levels, controlled for age, disease duration, BMI, eGFR, and creatinine, HbA1c, and triglyceride levels, revealed that the maximum length of a lesion was independently correlated with total serum cholesterol (r = −0.42; P = .001) and LDL-C (r = −0.47, P < .001) levels.
MCA of the Proximal Tibial Nerve
We further found the MCA of the proximal tibial nerve to be negatively correlated with NCVs of the tibial (r = −0.56; P < .001) and peroneal nerves (r = −0.46; P < .001) (eFigure, E and F in the Supplement) and CMAPs of the tibial (r = −0.43; P = .001) and peroneal nerves (r = −0.48; P < .001). An increase of the MCA was negatively correlated with total serum cholesterol (r = −0.38; P < .001) (Figure 2C) and serum LDL-C (r = −0.33; P = .002) levels. A positive correlation was found between the MCA and the mean maximum length of a lesion (r = 0.44; P < .001). Additional partial regression analysis for the MCA and cholesterol levels, controlled for age, disease duration, BMI, eGFR, and creatinine, HbA1c, and triglyceride levels, revealed that the MCA was independently correlated with total serum cholesterol (r = −0.43; P = .001) and LDL-C (r = 0.50; P < .001) levels.
Data on the NCV and CMAP of the tibial and/or the peroneal nerve and sural sensory nerve action potentials were missing in a total of 11 participants because patients interrupted the examination or technical problems with the equipment occurred. Another 8 sural nerve sensory nerve action potentials are missing in patients with severe neuropathy and obesity because sensory nerve action potentials could not be recorded properly owing to severe nerve damage or impaired recording caused by patient obesity.
One principle finding of this study was that lipid metabolism may play an essential role in the development of peripheral nerve damage in patients with T2D and DPN. Specifically, we found that low levels of total serum cholesterol and LDL-C were associated with a higher load, diameter, and length of T2wFS-hypointense, lipid-equivalent nerve lesions and with impaired nerve conduction and an increasing severity of a patient’s clinical symptoms. In our cohort, LELs occurred independently from other risk factors, such as elevated HbA1c levels, renal function outcomes, patient’s age, BMI, or disease duration.
To our knowledge, this study was the first to visualize in vivo that low levels of serum cholesterol, specifically LDL-C, were accompanied by peripheral nerve damage in T2D DPN. Our study contradicts the results of previous studies11,12 that indicated that lowering serum cholesterol levels potentially slows the progression of DPN by lowering total serum cholesterol and LDL-C levels. Instead, our findings are in line with results of previous studies15,17,21,29,30 that found that the intake of statins and a decrease of serum cholesterol level are associated with neuropathic symptoms, microvascular damage, and an accelerated deterioration of peripheral nerve fibers. A potential explanation of the associations found in our cohort might be that lowering serum cholesterol levels impairs peripheral nerve regeneration because cholesterol cannot be produced in axons and therefore has to be supplied to neurite tips and adjacent Schwann cells of regenerating axons by either axonal transport or external supply via HDL-C and LDL-C.14,18,31,32 Lowering cholesterol levels with statins has been shown to be associated with a relevant decrease of cholesterol levels available for axonal regeneration on those 2 pathways, resulting in a different composition of lipids in the cholesterol-rich myelin sheath of Schwann cells, which causes nerve swelling attributable to reactive thickening of the myelin sheath comparable to that seen in hereditary disorders in cholesterol metabolism.14,20 Thus, an increase of lipid-equivalent nerve lesions and nerve volume, both correlated with a decrease in HDL-C and LDL-C, would represent nerve swelling attributable to an altered composition of lipids in Schwann cells as a consequence of insufficient cholesterol supply to regenerating neurites after neuropathic damage, eventually resulting in decreasing nerve conduction. One possible explanation for the positive associations of lowering lipids with statins with DPN found in previous studies12,21 might be that the known antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects of statins have a positive association with pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying DPN in T2D. In addition, macroangiopathic and microangiopathic changes may contribute to neuropathic damage, thus allowing lipid-lowering therapies to be potentially beneficial for patients with those conditions. One may argue, however, that the association of low serum cholesterol levels with the amount of nerve lesions only occurs as a secondary outcome because patients undergoing lipid-lowering therapies usually have macroangiopathy and microangiopathy and are more likely to have other potential risk factors for DPN, such as hypertension and renal insufficiency. We strove to minimize those potential confounders by excluding all patients with serologic findings of renal insufficiency or macroalbuminuria, and we also excluded all patients with signs of macroangiopathy in the ABI or IMT examination. Furthermore, we found no correlation between LEL load and 24-hour blood pressure recordings. Thus, our results suggest that a low serum cholesterol level is associated with the formation of LELs in T2D DPN. The findings of this study are not completely in line with previous results on the formation of LELs in DPN that have only found a correlation of LEL load with decreasing HDL-C levels but not LDL-C or total serum cholesterol levels in DPN.10 However, the aforementioned study comprised a collective of patients with T2D and T1D. The process underlying LEL formation may differ between diabetes types. This study was the first, to our knowledge, to examine the formation of LELs in patients with T2D and DPN exclusively.
The findings are of importance for the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying DPN in T2D because the long-term dyslipidemia outcomes seen in humans cannot be properly reproduced in rodents owing to substantial differences in lipid metabolism.33 In light of emerging therapies for dyslipidemia in T2D, such as PCSK9 inhibitors that promote a more aggressive lowering of serum cholesterol levels, our results suggest that current clinical trials including patients with very low serum cholesterol levels should pay close attention to signs of neuropathic damage.16
This hypothesis-generating study is limited by the fact that only cross-sectional data were acquired, which precludes longitudinal analysis. In addition, our cohort was not equally balanced with male and female participants, which does not allow for sex-specific analyses of our data. Because of the large amount of factors measured, the sample size of 100 participants precludes multivariate analyses with all factors acquired. However, our data are in line with the recently published longitudinal data of the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION), which found that low levels of HDL-C, total serum cholesterol, and LDL-C were associated with a worsening of DPN.30
This study was the first, to our knowledge, to visualize in vivo that low serum cholesterol levels, especially low LDL-C levels, were associated with peripheral nerve swelling and a higher load of LELs. The associated impaired nerve conduction in patients with T2D and DPN may have been attributable to an impairment of nerve regeneration after neuropathic damage. Regarding novel therapies for treating dyslipidemia in patients with T2D, our results suggest that clinical trials of patients with very low serum cholesterol levels should be vigilant about the onset or deterioration of neuropathic symptoms. Additional longitudinal studies on the role of cholesterol metabolism in DPN appear to be required to determine whether there is a critical threshold of serum cholesterol for an impairment of nerve regeneration.
Accepted for Publication: April 11, 2019.
Published: May 31, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4798
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2019 Jende JME et al. JAMA Network Open.
Corresponding Author: Felix T. Kurz, MD, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany (felix.kurz@med.uni-heidelberg.de).
Author Contributions: Dr Kurz had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Jende, Heiland, Pham, Nawroth, Bendszus, Kurz.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Jende, Groener, Rother, Kender, Hahn, Hilgenfeld, Juerchott, Preisner, Heiland, Kopf, Bendszus, Kurz.
Drafting of the manuscript: Jende, Pham, Nawroth, Kurz.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Jende, Groener, Rother, Kender, Hahn, Hilgenfeld, Juerchott, Preisner, Heiland, Kopf, Nawroth, Bendszus, Kurz.
Statistical analysis: Jende, Kopf, Kurz.
Obtained funding: Heiland, Pham, Bendszus.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Groener, Rother, Juerchott, Heiland, Pham, Nawroth, Bendszus, Kurz.
Supervision: Jende, Groener, Kender, Heiland, Pham, Nawroth, Bendszus, Kurz.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Jende reported receiving grants from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG], SFB1158) during the conduct of the study. Dr Groener reported receiving grants from DFG SFB1158 and receiving personal fees from Deutsches Zentrum für Diabetesforschung during the conduct of the study. Dr Kender reported receiving grants from DFG SFB1158 and DFG SFB1118 and receiving personal fees from Deutsches Zentrum für Diabetesforschung e.V. during the conduct of the study. Dr Heiland reported receiving grants from DFG SFB1118 during the conduct of the study. Dr Kopf reported receiving grants from DFG SFB1158 during the conduct of the study. Dr Pham reported receiving grants from DFG SFB1158 during the conduct of the study; Acandis and DFG SFB TR 240 Project B02 outside the submitted work; and personal fees from speaker honoraria from Bayer and Merck & Co. Dr Nawroth reported receiving grants from DFG SFB1158 during the conduct of the study and from Novo Nordisk outside the submitted work. Dr Bendszus reported receiving grants from DFG SFB1158 and SFB1118, the European Union, Hopp Foundation, Novartis, Guerbet, Siemens, Stryker, and Medtronic and receiving personal fees from TEVA, Merck & Co, Novartis, Codman, Boehringer, B. Braun Medical Inc, Bayer, Vascular Dynamics, Springer, and Nicaplant outside the submitted work. Dr Kurz was supported by DFG SFB1158 during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by grants SFB1158 (Drs Jende, Groener, Kender, Pham, Kopf, Nawroth, Bendszus, and Kurz) and SFB1118 (Drs Kender, Heiland, Nawroth, and Bendszus) from the German Research Foundation.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Additional Contributions: Dorothea Willich, Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany, provided ongoing support and technical performance of all magnetic resonance neurography examinations. She was compensated for her work.
4.Elliott
J, Tesfaye
S, Chaturvedi
N,
et al; EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study Group. Large-fiber dysfunction in diabetic peripheral neuropathy is predicted by cardiovascular risk factors.
Diabetes Care. 2009;32(10):1896-1900. doi:
10.2337/dc09-0554PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 12.Román-Pintos
LM, Villegas-Rivera
G, Rodríguez-Carrizalez
AD, Miranda-Díaz
AG, Cardona-Muñoz
EG. Diabetic polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: inflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function.
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:3425617. doi:
10.1155/2016/3425617PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 16.Segoviano-Mendoza
M, Cárdenas-de la Cruz
M, Salas-Pacheco
J,
et al. PCSK9 inhibitors and neurocognitive adverse events: exploring the FDA directive and a proposal for N-of-1 trials.
J Lipid Res. 2017;4(1):427-443. doi:
10.1186/s12888-018-1596-zGoogle Scholar 22.Young
MJ, Boulton
AJM, MacLeod
AF, Williams
DRR, Sonksen
PH. A multicentre study of the prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the United Kingdom hospital clinic population.
Diabetologia. 1993;36(2):150-154. doi:
10.1007/BF00400697PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 23.Haslbeck
M, Luft
D, Neundörfer
B, Stracke
H, Ziegler
D, Stracke
H. Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Sensorimotor Diabetic Neuropathy Appointed by the Managing Committee of the German Diabetes Association. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: German Diabetes Association; 2004.
30.Andersen
ST, Witte
DR, Dalsgaard
E-M,
et al. Risk factors for incident diabetic polyneuropathy in a cohort with screen-detected type 2 diabetes followed for 13 years: ADDITION-Denmark.
Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):1068-1075. doi:
10.2337/dc17-2062PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref